I didn't wear a Covid mask. As a jeweller, I wear a mask with a seal round the edges and a filter when polishing (a filthy job) and I know that the masks everyone was wearing don't even keep out polishing particles, which are way bigger than a virus. Masks are theatre, to demonstrate submission.
I hope next time more people will refuse to wear them.
Me too. I agree masks do demonstrate submission, and they also have a number of other negative consequences (e.g. fear perpetuation, shaming, & the provision of encouragement to scapegoat the non-compliers).
With the mountains of official evidence revealled in the UK over the past 3 years my point is there shouldn't be any next time. This evidence = the real operation muzzle covering both mainstream and critic alike.
👉In addition, any droplets on a mask are droplets for some seconds only as your breath drys them and you suck in the dried content.
👉Most importantly, no virus has ever been found so any face mas is not protecting from a virus. Only soot and dust and some pollen. A respirator could protect from rotten or rancid chemicals sneezed from person to person, so you can still enjoy wearing a respirator all day- but it's not about a virus.
Historical facts being rewritten in the name of pseudo-science to enable tyranny. As you say Gary, we must not succomb. Will share with friends and family.
It people want to discredit masks once and for all showing people the official evidence of what was really harming and killing people en mass during the Spring of 2020 and beyond would be the most powerful approach. Hint. It wasn't any novel pathogen.
You also won't find any of this testimony written about/spoken about on any media site whether mainstream or 'alternative'. My emails, substacks and the associated X posts all ignored by those 'speaking out'. It's mind numbing the approach to this given so many of us have friends, family and loved ones that could fall victim to another panicdemic tomorrow.
PS- I look forward to all the popular covid critic 'whitewash' X posts March 19th when chair Hallett gives statement vs Module 3 as they have done previously for Module 2. So many 'experts' that haven't even watched the inquiry?
The official covid narratives - around masks, vaccines, lockdowns etc - need to be challenged in multiple ways; focusing only on the harms alone would be insufficient to prevent the same thing happening again. Also, it is perfectly rational to believe that the powerful content (from written statements and oral testimony) of the Inquiries deserves much greater media coverage AND that the conclusions/recommendations are pre-determined; this is not an either/or.
I hold the view that the most effective way of reducing the likelihood of these 'pandemic' horrors happening again is to empower more and more people to openly (not anonymously) show visible dissent/non-compliance. Again, there are a number of ways of making this more likely, with highlighting the harms being a necessary, but not sufficient, component.
My main point is Gary that simply showing people the mountains of official evidence (which clearly casts doubt on the deadly pandemic claim itself) then by default removes the need for masks, vaccines, lockdowns etc as those are all instigated on the belief a deadly novel pathogen was running rampant harming and killing people en mass in 2020. Was it? I'm not convinced based on the inquiry evidence.
Also critiques on masks, vaccines and lockdowns have been a constant since 2020-present. Thousands of critic articles+ many open letters etc but not the case vs the official evidence confirming how people were treated during the Spring of 2020 as now revealled from our own (TWO) world leading inquiries in the UK.
The most effective way imo of (not reducing) but stopping the likelihood of the lockdown horrors happening again and for a generation is inform and thus empower more people with the real evidence from our public inquiries which has fully exposed those horrors which can then be used to robustly challenge MPs and other officials. Sadly, none of that is happeing. Quite the opposite. The real truth is being kept away from the public consciousness. The popularity of what i post about amongst the covid critic/medical freedom community testament to that.
Lastly if critics focused on what the inquires have actually revealled not what they haven't and set aside the 'whitewash' mantra which is exactly what the inquiry wants people to hear btw things would be a whole lot better. It's not a whitewash when you are told the truth it becomes a whitewash when people choose not to report on it/debate/speak about it. What more do people want to see and hear? (thinking out loud). I simply don't get the widespread willfull resistance over this information admitted live on Youtube for 3 years. eg: Why haven't all HART members reposted these X-links? Should they not also be writing articles and creating open letters for the public to email MPs to help prevent another panicdemic? Stopping masks and covid jabs is not enough to prevent that. Besides i think far more everyday people are just naturally more informed now about masks and covid jabs than they are about the inquiry evidence which digs into the roots.
My main point, Dave, is that there are multiple ways in which the official 'pandemic' narrative about a 'deadly virus' could be debunked, hence making the horrors of 2020 a thing of the past, never to be repeated. While I acknowledge that personal stories illustrating the many harms endured as direct consequences of the restrictions (as revealed in the Inquiries) can be an effective way of changing the minds of ordinary people, other revelations could, potentially, achieve the same ends - for instance: the statistical evidence showing lockdowns (& other restrictions) achieved no significant benefits; the historical information about vaccine harms/ineffectiveness; the gaping holes in the foundational science of virology; the grotesque levels of manipulation/censorship/smearing we endured throughout the covid event; the manipulation & fabrication of data from official sources; and the invalid/unreliable PCR tests.
Changing the minds of human beings is a complex business. If the presentation of evidence counter to the official narrative was sufficient to achieve this aim, the 'covid pandemic' story would have been successfully undermined back in late 2020/early 2021. People vary greatly as to the type of experiences that influence them. We are all riddled with cognitive biases that strive to minimise any change to our current beliefs. Changing the views of a person who is fully committed to the dominant covid narrative would require a very different approach as compared to someone who is already having doubts about the veracity of the public health messaging. Hence, multiple types of counterinformation are required to change the minds of a significant number of people and empower them to show visible dissent.
Those of us who are critical of the 'pandemic' narratives would all wish for our outputs to gain much more traction. I know I do. We all have busy lives, specific interests, limited attention spans, bouts of disillusionment, that inevitably mean that we pick up on, and promote, only a small fraction of the good stuff published by our allies. On top of that, of course, we all have to contend with the algorithms that minimise the reach of narratives inconsistent with the official story. Yes, I accept there may be a handful of 'controlled opposition' out there who are strategically minimising the reach of potentially potent counterinformation, but I believe they are few and far between.
And as for use of the term 'whitewash', we could quibble as to whether it is the best descriptor for the Inquiries; if one defines it as 'to gloss over unfavorable information', the pre-determined conclusions/recommendations of the UK Inquiry would (contrary to the powerful testimonies) be consistent with this characterisation.
''other revelations could, potentially, achieve the same ends.''
-I don't agree whether they be on lockdown efficacy/masks/covid jabs those areas have anywhere near the same impact as mountains of official COVID inquiry evidence because as much as it has exposed those elements it more crucially also calls into question the nature of the 'pandemic' itself. I believe that is the main reason it is avoided entirely or downplayed. Other elements you elude are soft targets by comparison.
When you try to gain traction with the inquiry information it becomes very clear that and only that topic is the real operation muzzle. ;-)
Like why would not every covid critic platform takes seconds to like, share and comment on this post and so what are they deeming more important instead?
It's not about changing people's mind's to me it's about giving the public a chance to decide for themselves what the totality of their own public inquiry official evidence represents but they are not being informed with both the popular covid critic/alt media and mainstream facilitating that reality. But so many can sure talk about and critique lockdowns and jabs and masks for 5 years in a row which have undoubtedly been the dominant critic narratives. It has a feel to it of look over here but not there.
I've always found it fascinating so many people who highly likely never even watched the inquiry nor read many if any wintess statements would promote such a view as ''whitewash.'' Yet practically every covid critic view and more has been corroborated in detail. I've relentlessly highlighted this only for the vast majority of that evidence to be ignored.
With regards people being 'too busy.' It's not alot to ask that inquiry articles be shared on a consistent basis as it takes seconds whether here or on X but for whatever reason real information capable of turning the tide is resisted not promoted.
As i previously said for 'the inquiry experts' to shout about ''whitewash'' and get hundreds of thousands of views only serves the interests of the inquiry and forms part of the whitewash. A genuine covid critic voice of the people would promote the actual evidence (as i have) in the hope of attaining hundreds of thousands of views not look for any reason to ignore it and thus no views.
The approach to this information by so many ''speaking out'' is extremely revealling. It's like the whitewashing of a whitewash making double sure no one pays attention. And it's worked!
A comment i received from a subscriber explains things well.
‘‘You’re not grifting for money, and you’re not claiming other people’s work as your own - you are documenting an official process which nobody else has been doing - that alone gives what you ‘re doing validity, whether they see the value or not.’’
‘‘You’re not pushing a political ideology like racism or left/right stuff - just documenting important testimony & evidence from an official process which nobody in either msm or alt media has bothered to do.’’
‘‘You’ve personally edited out of the hundreds of hours of video, the most pertinent & damning evidence, which the inquiry process itself has effectively ignored in it’s conclusions, so the ultimate point of what you’re doing is to demonstrate that the inquiry itself is biased towards predetermined conclusions, and exposing this is something nobody else has done.’’
Genuinely curious Gary. Can you offer an explanation why factual revelations like this are not shouted about from the preverbial rooftops by all HART members with urgent calls to action for people to email their MPS etc? The way i see it the truth IS being told at the inquires. The media simply don't want people to know and and neither do the critics or even the prominent UK alt media eg; 'whitewash' who it's easy to prove on this one issue are all in lockstep denial. A real manipulation of the masses has taken place.
Looks like the real operation muzzle has kicked in again when i ask basic questions as an everyday layperson about why the inquiry silence/lack of support from so many at HART and elsewhere 'speaking out'? A reasonable line of questioning in relation to what has been evidenced.
Eveyone has to stand for what they believe in. I'm not really sure what we are disagreeing on though. I believe the hierarchy of official evidence shows what went on during the Spring of 2020 comes out on top as it get's to the root. . For me a logical/factual appraisal of the situation shows the dissident lockdown/mask/covid jab narrative has had widespread exposure and a plentiful supply of consistent articles/podcasts/open letters etc since 2020 in comparison to the now all but confirmed crimes against humanity that were carried out during the Spring of 2020 as evidenced at BOTH UK and Scottish COVID inquiries. Not as big a deal apparently to make such a fuss about. The inquiries a tick box exercise at best for a tiny few that claimed interest. Dare i say even managed? The show goes on when it should have been over long ago. 6 years down the line truth is still not popular and as a matter of observable reality sadly has been and remains suppressed.
I think people forget it's COVID-19 The Great Reset and so imo without exposing the roots of that nothing can nor has changed for the better. (1eg; Anne's Law now active in Scotland). The inquiry reveals are so damning which has to be the main reason they have been jettisoned throughout all media. 12 likes and 10 restacks for this for example. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry22-oct-2025?utm_source=publication-search
I didn't wear a Covid mask. As a jeweller, I wear a mask with a seal round the edges and a filter when polishing (a filthy job) and I know that the masks everyone was wearing don't even keep out polishing particles, which are way bigger than a virus. Masks are theatre, to demonstrate submission.
I hope next time more people will refuse to wear them.
Me too. I agree masks do demonstrate submission, and they also have a number of other negative consequences (e.g. fear perpetuation, shaming, & the provision of encouragement to scapegoat the non-compliers).
With the mountains of official evidence revealled in the UK over the past 3 years my point is there shouldn't be any next time. This evidence = the real operation muzzle covering both mainstream and critic alike.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry-module-10-d83
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing
In any case, breath goes round a cloth mask, not through it.
Whilst for no benefit with the mask constantly helping to make you ill.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newharms-from-mask-wearing?utm_source=publication-search
At 55 sec here you can clearly see particles in breadth even larger than 100nm going thru a cloth mask.
https://videos.files.wordpress.com/4egEyh2b/masks-aerosols-dr-ted-noel_dvd.mp4
👉In addition, any droplets on a mask are droplets for some seconds only as your breath drys them and you suck in the dried content.
👉Most importantly, no virus has ever been found so any face mas is not protecting from a virus. Only soot and dust and some pollen. A respirator could protect from rotten or rancid chemicals sneezed from person to person, so you can still enjoy wearing a respirator all day- but it's not about a virus.
Historical facts being rewritten in the name of pseudo-science to enable tyranny. As you say Gary, we must not succomb. Will share with friends and family.
Thank you, Ros.
It people want to discredit masks once and for all showing people the official evidence of what was really harming and killing people en mass during the Spring of 2020 and beyond would be the most powerful approach. Hint. It wasn't any novel pathogen.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry4-mar-2026-884
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry3-mar-2026-203
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry4-mar-2026-a34
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry3-mar-2025
You also won't find any of this testimony written about/spoken about on any media site whether mainstream or 'alternative'. My emails, substacks and the associated X posts all ignored by those 'speaking out'. It's mind numbing the approach to this given so many of us have friends, family and loved ones that could fall victim to another panicdemic tomorrow.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry-module-10-7a9
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquirymodule-10
PS- I look forward to all the popular covid critic 'whitewash' X posts March 19th when chair Hallett gives statement vs Module 3 as they have done previously for Module 2. So many 'experts' that haven't even watched the inquiry?
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newneil-oliver-the-uk-covid-19-inquiry?utm_source=publication-search
The official covid narratives - around masks, vaccines, lockdowns etc - need to be challenged in multiple ways; focusing only on the harms alone would be insufficient to prevent the same thing happening again. Also, it is perfectly rational to believe that the powerful content (from written statements and oral testimony) of the Inquiries deserves much greater media coverage AND that the conclusions/recommendations are pre-determined; this is not an either/or.
I hold the view that the most effective way of reducing the likelihood of these 'pandemic' horrors happening again is to empower more and more people to openly (not anonymously) show visible dissent/non-compliance. Again, there are a number of ways of making this more likely, with highlighting the harms being a necessary, but not sufficient, component.
My main point is Gary that simply showing people the mountains of official evidence (which clearly casts doubt on the deadly pandemic claim itself) then by default removes the need for masks, vaccines, lockdowns etc as those are all instigated on the belief a deadly novel pathogen was running rampant harming and killing people en mass in 2020. Was it? I'm not convinced based on the inquiry evidence.
Also critiques on masks, vaccines and lockdowns have been a constant since 2020-present. Thousands of critic articles+ many open letters etc but not the case vs the official evidence confirming how people were treated during the Spring of 2020 as now revealled from our own (TWO) world leading inquiries in the UK.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/exclusiveuk-covid-19-inquiry-bereaved?utm_source=publication-search
The most effective way imo of (not reducing) but stopping the likelihood of the lockdown horrors happening again and for a generation is inform and thus empower more people with the real evidence from our public inquiries which has fully exposed those horrors which can then be used to robustly challenge MPs and other officials. Sadly, none of that is happeing. Quite the opposite. The real truth is being kept away from the public consciousness. The popularity of what i post about amongst the covid critic/medical freedom community testament to that.
Lastly if critics focused on what the inquires have actually revealled not what they haven't and set aside the 'whitewash' mantra which is exactly what the inquiry wants people to hear btw things would be a whole lot better. It's not a whitewash when you are told the truth it becomes a whitewash when people choose not to report on it/debate/speak about it. What more do people want to see and hear? (thinking out loud). I simply don't get the widespread willfull resistance over this information admitted live on Youtube for 3 years. eg: Why haven't all HART members reposted these X-links? Should they not also be writing articles and creating open letters for the public to email MPs to help prevent another panicdemic? Stopping masks and covid jabs is not enough to prevent that. Besides i think far more everyday people are just naturally more informed now about masks and covid jabs than they are about the inquiry evidence which digs into the roots.
https://substack.com/@scottishcovidinquiry/note/c-226133214 =396 X views
https://substack.com/@scottishcovidinquiry/note/c-226631346 =174 X views
My main point, Dave, is that there are multiple ways in which the official 'pandemic' narrative about a 'deadly virus' could be debunked, hence making the horrors of 2020 a thing of the past, never to be repeated. While I acknowledge that personal stories illustrating the many harms endured as direct consequences of the restrictions (as revealed in the Inquiries) can be an effective way of changing the minds of ordinary people, other revelations could, potentially, achieve the same ends - for instance: the statistical evidence showing lockdowns (& other restrictions) achieved no significant benefits; the historical information about vaccine harms/ineffectiveness; the gaping holes in the foundational science of virology; the grotesque levels of manipulation/censorship/smearing we endured throughout the covid event; the manipulation & fabrication of data from official sources; and the invalid/unreliable PCR tests.
Changing the minds of human beings is a complex business. If the presentation of evidence counter to the official narrative was sufficient to achieve this aim, the 'covid pandemic' story would have been successfully undermined back in late 2020/early 2021. People vary greatly as to the type of experiences that influence them. We are all riddled with cognitive biases that strive to minimise any change to our current beliefs. Changing the views of a person who is fully committed to the dominant covid narrative would require a very different approach as compared to someone who is already having doubts about the veracity of the public health messaging. Hence, multiple types of counterinformation are required to change the minds of a significant number of people and empower them to show visible dissent.
Those of us who are critical of the 'pandemic' narratives would all wish for our outputs to gain much more traction. I know I do. We all have busy lives, specific interests, limited attention spans, bouts of disillusionment, that inevitably mean that we pick up on, and promote, only a small fraction of the good stuff published by our allies. On top of that, of course, we all have to contend with the algorithms that minimise the reach of narratives inconsistent with the official story. Yes, I accept there may be a handful of 'controlled opposition' out there who are strategically minimising the reach of potentially potent counterinformation, but I believe they are few and far between.
And as for use of the term 'whitewash', we could quibble as to whether it is the best descriptor for the Inquiries; if one defines it as 'to gloss over unfavorable information', the pre-determined conclusions/recommendations of the UK Inquiry would (contrary to the powerful testimonies) be consistent with this characterisation.
''other revelations could, potentially, achieve the same ends.''
-I don't agree whether they be on lockdown efficacy/masks/covid jabs those areas have anywhere near the same impact as mountains of official COVID inquiry evidence because as much as it has exposed those elements it more crucially also calls into question the nature of the 'pandemic' itself. I believe that is the main reason it is avoided entirely or downplayed. Other elements you elude are soft targets by comparison.
When you try to gain traction with the inquiry information it becomes very clear that and only that topic is the real operation muzzle. ;-)
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newdrnaomi-wolfs-life-threatened?utm_source=publication-search
Like why would not every covid critic platform takes seconds to like, share and comment on this post and so what are they deeming more important instead?
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry4-mar-2026-884
It's not about changing people's mind's to me it's about giving the public a chance to decide for themselves what the totality of their own public inquiry official evidence represents but they are not being informed with both the popular covid critic/alt media and mainstream facilitating that reality. But so many can sure talk about and critique lockdowns and jabs and masks for 5 years in a row which have undoubtedly been the dominant critic narratives. It has a feel to it of look over here but not there.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newpandemic-limited-focus-of-debate
What actually happened to people during the Spring of 2020 barely get's a look in by comparison.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry3-mar-2025
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry-module-6-care?utm_source=publication-search
I've always found it fascinating so many people who highly likely never even watched the inquiry nor read many if any wintess statements would promote such a view as ''whitewash.'' Yet practically every covid critic view and more has been corroborated in detail. I've relentlessly highlighted this only for the vast majority of that evidence to be ignored.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newinquiry-whitewash-or-something
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newthe-uk-covid-19-inquiry-2023-2025?utm_source=publication-search
With regards people being 'too busy.' It's not alot to ask that inquiry articles be shared on a consistent basis as it takes seconds whether here or on X but for whatever reason real information capable of turning the tide is resisted not promoted.
As i previously said for 'the inquiry experts' to shout about ''whitewash'' and get hundreds of thousands of views only serves the interests of the inquiry and forms part of the whitewash. A genuine covid critic voice of the people would promote the actual evidence (as i have) in the hope of attaining hundreds of thousands of views not look for any reason to ignore it and thus no views.
The approach to this information by so many ''speaking out'' is extremely revealling. It's like the whitewashing of a whitewash making double sure no one pays attention. And it's worked!
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry-module-10-7a9
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquirymodule-10
A comment i received from a subscriber explains things well.
‘‘You’re not grifting for money, and you’re not claiming other people’s work as your own - you are documenting an official process which nobody else has been doing - that alone gives what you ‘re doing validity, whether they see the value or not.’’
‘‘You’re not pushing a political ideology like racism or left/right stuff - just documenting important testimony & evidence from an official process which nobody in either msm or alt media has bothered to do.’’
‘‘You’ve personally edited out of the hundreds of hours of video, the most pertinent & damning evidence, which the inquiry process itself has effectively ignored in it’s conclusions, so the ultimate point of what you’re doing is to demonstrate that the inquiry itself is biased towards predetermined conclusions, and exposing this is something nobody else has done.’’
Clearly, we will have to agree to differ on these points.
Genuinely curious Gary. Can you offer an explanation why factual revelations like this are not shouted about from the preverbial rooftops by all HART members with urgent calls to action for people to email their MPS etc? The way i see it the truth IS being told at the inquires. The media simply don't want people to know and and neither do the critics or even the prominent UK alt media eg; 'whitewash' who it's easy to prove on this one issue are all in lockstep denial. A real manipulation of the masses has taken place.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry22-oct-2025
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry4-mar-2026-884
Looks like the real operation muzzle has kicked in again when i ask basic questions as an everyday layperson about why the inquiry silence/lack of support from so many at HART and elsewhere 'speaking out'? A reasonable line of questioning in relation to what has been evidenced.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquirymodule-10
Eveyone has to stand for what they believe in. I'm not really sure what we are disagreeing on though. I believe the hierarchy of official evidence shows what went on during the Spring of 2020 comes out on top as it get's to the root. . For me a logical/factual appraisal of the situation shows the dissident lockdown/mask/covid jab narrative has had widespread exposure and a plentiful supply of consistent articles/podcasts/open letters etc since 2020 in comparison to the now all but confirmed crimes against humanity that were carried out during the Spring of 2020 as evidenced at BOTH UK and Scottish COVID inquiries. Not as big a deal apparently to make such a fuss about. The inquiries a tick box exercise at best for a tiny few that claimed interest. Dare i say even managed? The show goes on when it should have been over long ago. 6 years down the line truth is still not popular and as a matter of observable reality sadly has been and remains suppressed.
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/exclusiveuk-covid-19-inquiry-bereaved?utm_source=publication-search
The even bigger picture may show that the 'pandemic' was just another tool in the tool box of the controllers. Just like wars and climate scares.
That shouldn't demoralise us as critical thinking would deflate many of their pumped up, baloney-full plans.
I think people forget it's COVID-19 The Great Reset and so imo without exposing the roots of that nothing can nor has changed for the better. (1eg; Anne's Law now active in Scotland). The inquiry reveals are so damning which has to be the main reason they have been jettisoned throughout all media. 12 likes and 10 restacks for this for example. https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/newuk-covid-19-inquiry22-oct-2025?utm_source=publication-search