The two books, and a film, that could destroy the pandemic industry
Part I
I strongly believe that the most effective way of stopping the globalist juggernaut that is destroying our communities – a tyranny underpinned by the assumption that the government’s experts know what’s best for us all - is to promote more visible dissent and non-compliance among the general population. It is imperative that the millions of citizens who currently occupy the ‘silent middle’, (that is, those who harbour a degree of concern about the march of technocracy, but have not yet spoken out), feel sufficiently empowered to express their views publicly. But how can we make this happen?
Over the last few weeks, I have read/watched three scholarly commentaries that debunk the dominant narrative about ‘safe and effective’ vaccines, and – crucially – do so in a way that would be both understandable and shocking to most laypeople. If the contents of these three critical sources could be put in front of many more individuals it is my view that the conclusions therein would trigger masses of others to visibly dissent and thereby nullify one central pillar of the technocratic machine, namely the pandemic industry.
What are these three sources of information that could potentially neutralise a major component of the globalist power grab? They comprise two books and a film:
1. Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History by Suzanne Humphries & Roman Bystrianyk.
2. Can You Catch a Cold? Untold History & Human Experiments by Daniel Roytas.
3. An Inconvenient Study – a film by Del Bigtree.
Given the number of crucial truths and observations contained within each of these works, I will dedicate an article to each. The text will be structured around ‘key facts’ (as shown in bold type), so that readers can quickly appreciate why I believe this trio of sources must be accessed by as many people of possible. Further detail will then be provided in the body of the article.
Part I: Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, & the Forgotten History – Suzanne Humphries & Roman Bystrianyk
Published in 2015, this book draws on numerous historical records to persuasively demonstrate that vaccines are NOT responsible for the decline in mortality from infectious diseases. Embedded within its 500 pages are myth-busting graphs that starkly show that, contrary to the claims of the medical establishment, the jabs have not provided ‘safe and effective’ protection against contagious illnesses.
Key fact 1: Almost all the reduction in deaths from infectious disease occurred PRIOR to widespread vaccination.
Contrary to what the pandemic industry continues to espouse, and to what most people believe, vaccines were not the medical miracle that saved us all from the scourge of deadly infectious diseases. Indeed, death rates from the most feared contagious illnesses had markedly declined before vaccines became commonplace. As way of illustration:
- Tuberculosis mortality reduced by 98% in the period 1860s to 1940s, well before the introduction of vaccines in 1954;
- Whooping cough mortality reached a peak around the start of the 19th century, but had plummeted by over 99% by the time that the national vaccination programmes began in the US (1940s) and in England (1957);
- Measles mortality rates, although at significant levels during the 19th century, had fallen by nearly 100% before the introduction of the national measles vaccination programme in 1968;
- Smallpox mortality has, over the last 350 years, tended to peak when vaccination levels within the general population were at their highest. Conversely, periods where relatively few people died from smallpox have often occurred during times of low inoculation rates.
(The graphs illustrating the veracity of the above assertions are easier to read on Roman Bystrianyk’s Substack).
Key fact 2: The medical establishment has consistently downplayed the huge benefits of social reform/societal changes in reducing infectious disease mortality.
As the book starkly illustrates, the credit for the striking reduction in infectious-disease mortality should be given to the 19th century social reformers, whose efforts led to marked improvements in diet, housing, working conditions, sanitation, and access to clean drinking water. These humanitarian reforms, as opposed to any pharmaceutical innovations, were chiefly responsible for the much improved survival rates. Predictably, the medical establishment clings to the idea that vaccines have been the predominant life saver, but the reality is beautifully captured by the quote, ‘When the tide is receding from the beach it is easy to have the illusion that one can empty the ocean by removing the water with a pail’ (Rene Dubos, American micro-biologist).
Key fact 3: Inoculations – the introduction of biological material into healthy people, purportedly to evoke immunity to a disease – has, through the ages, maimed and killed countless numbers of babies and children.
Powerful, emotion-evoking, true stories are far more effective at changing readers’ minds than facts and figures, and this book incorporates many such tales of vaccines inflicting death and incapacity upon the innocent recipients. Relying on authentic medical reports of the time to pack an even greater punch, we learn of:
1914: Arthur (aged 11): limbs swollen within a week, blisters with yellow pus over entire body: ‘Instead of attending school or playing with children of his own age he has to sit by the stove in the house, swathed in ointment-soaked bandages & suffer untold agony’.
1915: Thomas (aged 7): ‘He was totally blind for more than a year … stricken with paralysis & the spine began to twist … two years later he lost the power of speech & now all he can do is utter gutturals which are intelligible.’
1945: D.M. & G.M. (10-month old twins) who died after receiving their second dose of diphtheria/Whooping cough vaccine: ‘After the second immunizing injections, both infants cried considerably on reaching home; they vomited … and when next noticed by their parents appeared lifeless … ice cold and wringing wet with perspiration’.
1958: ‘A case is reported of an 8-months old normal child who, within 24 hours of … inoculation became pyrexial [with fever], drowsy, and hypotonic. Convulsions & evidence of mental deterioration followed rapidly. At 3 years of age convulsions still persisted and mental retardation was gross.’
Key fact 4: Throughout history, the medical establishment has often resorted to coercion and manipulation to increase the vaccination rate.
Reading about the history of vaccines, and the methods the government (and their medical experts) have deployed to promote their uptake, one may experience a strong sense of déjà vu. Since the mid-19th century, our political leaders have – recurrently – resorted to coercion as a means of increasing inoculation rates within the general population. Unvaccinated children were excluded from schools, while their parents suffered the imposition of hefty fines and imprisonment. Alongside these vaccine mandates, psychological manipulation – similar to that witnessed during the recent covid event – was widespread, the medical establishment typically espousing mantras such as, ‘The unvaccinated are a danger to others’, while warning that infectious illness will ‘spread like wildfire’ through unvaccinated populations. And the essence of the modern-day pandemic industry was captured by a banner, seen in the ‘Great Demonstration’ of 1885 in Leicester – a rebellion of up 100,000 people protesting against vaccine coercion – that read, ‘THE THREE PILLARS OF VACCINATION: FRAUD, FORCE & FOLLY’. Some things never change!
Key fact 5: Most vaccines – including those for tuberculosis, smallpox, whooping cough and measles - have never been tested against an inert placebo to demonstrate their safety and effectiveness.
The ‘Dissolving Illusions’ book also highlights another prevalent myth – one accepted by the bulk of the general population – that all the vaccines, (currently being pumped into the fragile bodies of our children), have been thoroughly tested for their safety and effectiveness. This is untrue. As anyone with a grasp of the basic scientific method knows, the most reliable way of demonstrating that a medical intervention results in more benefits than harms is to test it against an ‘inert placebo’. In simple terms what this means is that, to discover whether a treatment is healing or maiming us, a large group of vaccine recipients would need to be compared with a large group of comparable people who receive an inactive substance (such as salt solution), and are then followed up for five years or more. Better still, neither the vaccine recipients nor the placebo recipients should be aware of what group they are in; similarly, the researchers conducting the follow up should also be ‘blinded’ as to which group each subject is in. This is the only legitimate way of demonstrating, beyond reasonable doubt, that something is safe and effective, yet none of the mainstream vaccines - currently being pushed on children and adults alike – have been tested in this way.
A sincere request
The only way to stop the global elite from stripping us all of our human rights and freedoms is to empower more people to show visible dissent towards, and refuse to comply with, the diktats of these authoritarian – we-know-what’s-best-for-you-all – technocrats. But such resistance by the masses will only be achieved if far more citizens of the Western world become informed of the egregious acts – past and present – of the ‘experts’ embedded within our previously trusted institutions. As shown by the ‘covid’ debacle, one such institution, an important component of the globalists’ armoury, is the pandemic industry.
It is imperative that the evidence of the shameful actions committed by the unholy alliance of governments, the pharmaceutical industry, and public health authorities be shared with more and more ordinary people. To this end, please spread the word about their wrongdoings in any way you can, perhaps by drawing the attention of others to the ‘Dissolving Illusions’ book, or by sharing the content of Roman Bystrianyk’s excellent Substack with friends and family.
Thank you.



I like your approach Gary, and have Dissolving illusions prominent on my desk and have watched your other suggestions as well.
But I also see that sheer logic and solid arguments will not open the eyes of the sleepers. Why? How come so many people see the world entirely differnt then 'we' do? I sensed something did not make sense early 2020. Why? The numbers did not seem logic, and were not in any relation to how the fear was spread. But we were a minority. The masses responded, well... as masses always do. They follow the main narrative, and create a massive collective. I am by now convinced that this collectivism is at the root of many of our issues. And has always been.
Guess I came late to the party. Like many others my eyes were openend during the Covid period, where 'they' pushed the lies a bit too hard. It has only woken up a relative small number of people, maybe 20% at best. Which is roughly what Mattias de Smet describes as the percentage of critical thinkers inside a society.
People that have a deviating view on the prevailing narrative are a threat to the collective and are ousted, shut down or otherwise silenced. Vaccines are a long held belief, almost a religion.
I have seen so many well documented, fact based articles about not just vaccines but all the other nonsensical beliefs of the current period. But the reactions from the collective (or elite) show that logical arguments are not the decisive factor. They will use the smallest mistake to devaluate the entire article, gaslight the authors, ridicule the scientists involved, pull up their own reports that state the opposite and so on.
The mainstream media present 'us' like a minority, a small number of quacks, conspiracy theorists. 'We' tend to be individualists, who hate being part of a collective (just ruminating now). So, its easy for the propaganda controllers such as media and governments to control the dissidents. Make them feel they're on their own. But are we? Do we really know how many people secrectly distrust the system?
I can no longer watch the mainstream news channels without increasing my blood pressure to a dangerous level. Its fraudulent, manipulative in an almost ridiculously transparent way. Good news is that they are losing viewers big time.
Things will only change when more people see through the lies. I think thats where the challenge lies. Here on Substack people have their differences as well, but they are discussed. Its a good thing to have different views. How do you reach the collective? Probably not on Substack, not by condescending behaviour. Will mass media die out? They are getting desperate, more and more people are obtaining their information from alternative channels. Which is a problem for the establishment. The solution? Censorship! The increasing censorship may be a sign that cracks are appearing in the dam.
Its hard to get the message across. People have been fighting the vaccine myth for centuries. But maybe the myth gets broken because they took it one step too far with the mRNA potions. And the monopoly of the mainstream media is broken.
What a rant, but is off my chest now:-)
Do we have the isolation and purification of this new bird flu?
Avian flu virus H5N1: No proof for existence, pathogenicity, or pandemic potential; non-“H5N1” causation omitted
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7173052/
Microscope Proves , chicken flu, Fraud.
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/chick-filet-virus-grips-wikistan?triedRedirect=true
More fakery from the wizards
Moderna CEO Stéphane Bancel Says They ‘Copied & Pasted’ the Spike Sequence From the Chinese Government
https://open.substack.com/pub/lionessofjudah/p/moderna-ceo-we-never-had-access-to?r=145evj&utm_medium=ios
Do we have the isolation and purification documents of Covid 19 it appears it never existed?
FOIs reveal that health/science institutions around the world (225 and counting!) have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/fois-reveal-that-health-science-institutions-around-the-world-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification/
They knew contagion didn't exist after the 1923 Lancaster Study, but they continued to push the fear narrative to keep a control on humanity.
https://en.rattibha.com/thread/1629159544348717061
ABOUT A YEAR INTO THE KANSAS FLU A STUDY CAME OUT CALLED THE THE
LANDMARK STUDY OF MILTON J.
ROSENAU, MD, "EXPERIMENTS TO DETERMINE MODE OF SPREAD OF INFLUENZA," WAS PUBLISHED IN THE JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL
ASSOCIATION IN 1919.
https://www.ggarchives.com/Influenza/TheRosenauExperiment-1918-1919.html
Dr Jane Ruby explains the genocidal Globalist agenda a must watch
https://x.com/RealDrJaneRuby/status/1876833307620409668?t=5RCGnvy0qXHVcikKzTpTNA&s=09