Discussion about this post

User's avatar
biologyphenom's avatar

From 'COVID' to 'climate.' A point i make is IF there really was a climate crisis caused by an excess of greenhouse gases why then would a government consciously decide to blow up the Nord Stream 2 pipeline?

"This is not a small amount of gas, and represents a reckless emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere’’

-Grant Allen, professor of Atmospheric Physics at the University of Manchester.

https://www.sciencealert.com/experts-estimate-the-scale-of-the-nord-stream-pipelines-methane-leak

Expand full comment
LuLu's avatar

Brilliant piece, thank you Gary! I have valued your authentic and insightful comments right from the very beginning of the so called ‘Pandemic’, and this takes it all one step further and relates it to what one might call the ‘next phase of the coup d’etat’!

What interests me, and I would value your views on this, is on a scientific basis how ‘successful’ do we think these ‘interventions’ turn out to be? On first sight, I personally, purely as a victim and/or observer of these shenanigans, would say, not very, especially in proportion to the amount of time and resources committed to them over the years.

I am in my 7th decade and I would suggest that very similar ‘techniques’ have been employed over these decades to ‘encourage’ the mass populace to accept and embrace mass immigration and multiculturalism. From the ‘they’re more British than we are’ in the very early phases of mass immigration, to the more recent ‘we need them to pay our pensions’ I personally have watched the British people be bombarded with relentless ‘positive influencing’ to nudge them into accepting massive cultural & social change. Yet, despite this, here we are with multiculturalism openly admitted as a failure and more and more people of all ages sceptical if not outright hostile to immigration.

Similar scepticism to public messaging was common during the ‘pandemic’ and was far greater than we were nudged to believe at the time. Likewise vaccination status, when the unvaccinated were being targeted (unsuccessfully) with ‘YOU are the only one not complying’ messages, before it was finally publicly conceded that anything between 25 - 45% of people across different societies were not taking the jab.

So, with all of this, I wonder just how effective or successful - realistically speaking - much of this ‘nudge’ actually is?

Is there any evidence that ancient communities and societies such as England/Europe have what might be called a thousand year embedded ‘mass inertia’ that may indeed be limiting the effects of these relatively new methods of people management? Might this ‘mass inertia’ be protecting us from the worst excesses of government and ruling class megalomania?

All interesting and very valid stuff, I think. Thank you.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts